TravelBudget exists because most trip-cost advice is anecdotal. We translate public market data into daily numbers you can plan against — and we show our work.
We pull from accommodation rate aggregators, restaurant price indexes, public transit fares, and attraction pricing — all sources you could cross-check.
Each daily figure is the sum of five categories: accommodation, food, local transport, activities, and miscellaneous (fees, tips, small purchases). Same five everywhere — no hidden buckets.
Each city has a budget, mid-range, and luxury daily figure. The multipliers between them are roughly 1×, 2.5×, and 6× — calibrated against thousands of real itineraries.
Low, shoulder, and peak multipliers (roughly 0.85×, 1×, 1.25×) reflect actual rate variation by destination. Lisbon's swing is wider than Tokyo's; the model accounts for that.
Flights, visas, vaccinations, and gear are fixed costs that swing by origin city and booking window. We deliberately exclude them from the daily figure so the per-day number stays comparable across 68 cities — add fixed costs separately at the trip level.
Disagree with our Paris number? Good. The model is transparent: five line items, three styles, three seasons. Replace any input with your own and the answer updates.
Every per-day figure on TravelBudget is built from the same five line items, so cities stay comparable. Anything that swings wildly by origin city or booking window is deliberately excluded from the daily total and handled as a fixed trip-level cost.
A planning tool is only useful if it's honest about its blind spots. TravelBudget does not model fast currency swings (a 20% FX move in two months will not be in last year's calibration), one-off festival and event peaks (Cannes during the film festival is not a normal Cannes), or hyper-local micro-markets (a beachfront resort costs nothing like the city centre two streets back).
We don't model long-stay discounts, group rates, or loyalty redemptions either — these can shift your real number significantly, but they apply unevenly and would muddy the comparison between destinations. The daily figure is a defensible starting point. Your actual itinerary is what tightens it.
Every input category is public and cross-checkable. We deliberately avoid self-reported "what I spent" anecdotes from forums — they're high-noise, low-signal, and skew toward the loudest spenders.
Not a booking engine. Not affiliate-monetised hotel rankings. Not "average traveller spend" self-reports from internet forums. Just a clean cost model, run consistently across 68 cities.